Thursday, October 25, 2012
CRYPTIC WEATHER SERVICE WHISTLEBLOWERS WARN 'FRANKENSTORM' IS MILITARY ELECTROMAGNETIC 'WEATHER MOD'?
URGENT ALL READERS... READ CAREFULLY THIS NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECAST -- A 'NEUROLINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING' CLARION CALL IF EVER I HEARD ONE:
PRELIMINARY EXTENDED FORECAST DISCUSSION
NWS HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL PREDICTION CENTER COLLEGE PARK MD
942 AM EDT THU OCT 25 2012
VALID 12Z MON OCT 29 2012 - 12Z THU NOV 01 2012
...HIGH IMPACT MERGING OF ENERGETIC SYSTEMS ANTICIPATED OFF THE
MID ATLANTIC COAST...
DESPITE A MODEST CLUSTER OF OUTLYING DETERMINISTIC SOLUTIONS AND
ENSEMBLE MEMBERS FROM THE VARIOUS MODELING CENTERS, THE LION'S
SHARE OF GUIDANCE INDICATES THAT THE CIRCULATION ASSOCIATED WITH
HURRICANE SANDY WILL PASS CLOSE ENOUGH TO THE AMPLIFYING POLAR
TROUGH OVER THE EASTERN UNITED STATES TO BECOME INCORPORATED INTO
A HYBRID VORTEX OVER THE MID ATLANTIC AND NORTHEAST NEXT TUESDAY.
THE HIGH DEGREE OF BLOCKING FROM EASTERN NORTH AMERICA ACROSS THE
ENTIRE ATLANTIC BASIN IS EXPECTED TO ALLOW THIS UNUSUAL MERGER TO
TAKE PLACE, AND ONCE THE COMBINED GYRE MATERIALIZES, IT SHOULD
SETTLE BACK TOWARD THE INTERIOR NORTHEAST THROUGH HALLOWEEN,
INVITING PERHAPS A GHOULISH NICKNAME FOR THE CYCLONE ALONG THE
LINES OF "FRANKENSTORM", AN ALLUSION TO MARY SHELLEY'S GOTHIC
CREATURE OF SYNTHESIZED ELEMENTS.
AS IS OFTEN THE CASE, WHEN ONE PART OF THE NATION IS EXPERIENCING
A VERY ENERGETIC ATMOSPHERE DISTURBANCE, THE REMAINDER IS
RELATIVELY CALM. THIS EVENT SHOULD NOT PROVE THE EXCEPTION, WITH A
FAIRLY BENIGN FEED OF PACIFIC AIR INTO MOST OF THE WESTERN AND
CENTRAL STATES. THE FAR WEST, PARTICULAR NORTH OF CALIFORNIA, WILL
HAVE ENOUGH SUSTAINED ONSHORE FLOW TO KEEP THE PERIOD WET AND
That's NWS forecaster Jim Cisco -- in my view, the Paul Revere of the Electromagnetic Age.
Good people inside the National Weather Service (NWS) are trying to tell us that this approaching hurricane "Frankenstorm" is a MILITARY ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPON WEATHER MOD -- A SYNTHESIZED, MANUFACTURED EVENT.
There is NO OTHER WAY to read that forecast. Special attention all journalists: tell your editors to take off their blinders and see what's happening here... someone at NWS will confirm this. And these weather mod gods can REVERSE this weather pattern, just as they can spawn it.
THIS IS NOT A JOKE. I AM A VETERAN MAINSTREAM JOURNALIST AND I AM BEING DEADLY SERIOUS.
THE NEUROLINGUISIC PROGRAMMING IS UNMISTAKEABLE -- NOTABLY, THE REFERENCE TO SHELLEY'S 'FRANKENSTEIN' AS A 'GOTHIC CREATURE OF SYNTHESIZED ELEMENTS.'
THIS IS NOT HOW A STANDARD-ISSUE WEATHER BUREAU FORECAST IS WRITTEN.
THIS IS A CRYPTIC BUT URGENT WARNING.
As I have written earlier, and posted widely on the internet:
U.S. MILITARY HAS HIGH-TECH THAT CAN UNLEASH, OR TAME THE WEATHER: WHY ISN'T THIS POWER BEING USED FOR GOOD AND NOT EVIL?
The U.S. government possesses scalar electromagnetic technology that allows Homeland-military-intel to "alter atmospheric conditions," according to U.S. Patent 7629918, held by Raytheon, for the "multifunctional radio frequency directed energy weapon system," which, this veteran mainstream journalist has reported, is deployed on cell towers nationwide and is being criminally used to silently assault, torture, impair and harm Americans extrajudicially targeted by government and military contractor ideologues and hate-mongers as "dissidents," "undesirables" or "pre-criminals." This technology could be used to end drought and mitigate the effects of dangerous weather systems; instead it is being used as a weapon of torture, enslavement and slow-kill murder.
For those who are not aware that the U.S. military has been working for years on weather modification as a weapon of war, please read this U.S. Air Force white paper from 1996; it may open your eyes to what could be happening today:
Friday, October 19, 2012
* The real reason why POTUS couldn't make an early call of "terrorism"? Perhaps because the Sept. 11th pre-planned military raid on the U.S. diplomatic consulate in Benghazi, Libya, which resulted in the loss of four American lives, was an inside job. Just another "conspiracy theory"? Read this before you decide.
AFTER-ACTION REPORT Tuesday morning, Oct. 23, 2012: Debate moderator Bob Schieffer of CBS News gave both presidential candidates an opportunity to litigate the handling of the Sept. 11th Benghazi consulate attack by making it his opening question. President Obama, and then Mitt Romney, ducked the question -- and Schieffer declined to follow up. I believe the analysis below, written three days before the debate, helps explain why both candidates chose not to "go there." A spokesperson for the Romney camp told CBS News that their man didn't press the issue because the facts were still unclear. Funny, that didn't stop him from making a major issue of Benghazi just minutes after the incident was confirmed by U.S. officials....
As of Friday, Oct. 19, three days before the final presidential debate between President Obama and Mitt Romney, it would appear the GOP challenger is gaining traction on what could be the deciding factor in the Nov. 6th election -- whether the Obama administration ignored pleas for more security at its diplomatic outposts in Libya, and attempted to cover for its failure to act by downplaying what clearly was a pre-planned military operation timed to occur on the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington.
But President Obama may have an ace up his sleeve if he can show -- or even strongly imply -- that word of the fatal attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya was leaked to the Romney camp before the U.S. had officially confirmed the deaths four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya.
Secretary of State Clinton confirmed the deaths of Libya Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others in a statement delivered at 10:08pm EDT. Just 17 minutes later, the Romney campaign released its own brief statement, a harsh condemnation of the Obama administration, calling it "disgraceful that the Obama Administration’s first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks.”
That statement, taking blatant political advantage of a foreign policy crisis, also was patently untrue. Secretary Clinton did say that "some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet" -- an amateurish anti-Muslim video posted on YouTube. And she did add that the U.S. "deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others." But in no way did she "sympathize with those who waged the attacks," as the Romney statement had claimed.
Romney also got it wrong by stating that an initial State Department condemnation of inflammatory anti-Muslim internet rants, from the American embassy in Cairo, came after the Benghazi attack. In fact, that initial State Department condemnation of anti-Muslim rhetoric came about ten hours before the consulate attack -- an attempt to quell violence ostensibly spawned by the YouTube video.
Was the Romney camp so quick to capitalize on the Benghazi attack because it knew the attack was coming -- or because it had received advance word from inside sources that at least one American had died in the attack? The Romney statement issued just 17 minutes after Sec. Clinton's confirmation of multiple American fatalities specifically referenced "the death of an American consulate worker." A single American, not more than one. Curious, indeed.
If the Romney camp was indeed tipped off to the fatal attack -- either before it happened or before the fatalities were confirmed by Sec. Clinton -- it could be an indication that someone within the U.S. security establishment had committed what used to be referred to as a act of sedition? If that is what happened here (and we do not yet know the full story) that would constitute a security breach of major proportions, a treasonous act motivated by geopolitical gamesmanship.
Perhaps THAT is why President Obama made only an oblique reference to "acts of terror" in a Rose Garden statement the morning after the Sept. 11th attack. And for two weeks thereafter, administration spokespeople, including U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice and White House press secretary Jay Carney, refused to state outright that the Benghazi attack was "terrorism" -- instead sticking to the line that the incident was believed to have been sparked by that anti-Muslim video produced in Hollywood and uploaded to YouTube.
Obama and his administration repeatedly vowed to investigate what really happened in Benghazi, and why -- and significantly, in my opinion, the President called in the FBI, not military intelligence or the Central Intelligence Agency, to conduct the administration's primary investigation on the ground.
Tellingly, perhaps, President Obama used the term "inside job" at a Sept. 21st political rally in Northern Virginia, an apparent reference to his statement the day before in an interview on the Spanish network Univision that Washington "can't be changed from the inside."
Obama's Univision comment had prompted Romney to deride Obama for an inability to effect political change -- Romney vowing, "I will change Washington. I will get the job done from the inside."
Obama delivered this response to Romney's vow at that Virginia political rally:
"What kind of inside job is he talking about? We don't want an inside job in Washington. We want change in Washington."
While no media commentator picked up on Obama's usage of the term "inside job," with its sinister connotations, I think I may have heard Obama's "neurolinguistic programming" meme loud and clear.
President Obama, in a mostly somber interview Thursday night, Oct. 18, with The Daily Show's Jon Stewart, repeated his pledge to get to the bottom of what really happened in Benghazi. That appearance provoked derision from conservative media pundits, in part because Obama picked up on Stewart's use of the term "optimal" when he asked Obama if the American people were sufficiently informed about the facts of the Benghazi attack. Obama said this, as quoted on the Politico.com website:
"Every piece of information that we get, as we got it, we laid it out to the American people. The picture eventually gets fully filled in.... Here’s what I’ll say. When four Americans get killed, it’s not optimal. We’re going to fix it. All of it."
At first blush, Obama's response seemed inadequate. After all, it WAS a terrorist attack, the administration finally acknowledged.
Or WAS It? What if the "terrorists" were directed by covert operatives on a mission with a political overtones motivated by domestic politics -- what the spooks term a "false flag attack" -- intended to influence domestic politics in America on the eve of a presidential election?
And I repeat: What if the Romney camp knew something was coming -- even if their advance knowledge was limited to the fact that the attack on the American consulate resulted in the loss of life?
Just as the President's critics are pointing out on the eve of the third and final debate -- devoted to foreign policy -- this story is far from over. But maybe not for the reasons that Obama's critics think.
Remember the Iranian hostage crisis, in which the American hostages were released only after President Reagan officially took office on January 20th, 1980 -- the result of a secret deal that was negotiated during the run-up to the election in which Reagan defeated Democrat Jimmy Carter.
At a bare minimum, this could be a 21st century remake of such political intrigue. But this time, the covert action could extend much, much deeper -- perhaps even explaining why, I have concluded, President Obama's performance in the first debate was purposefully degraded by a no-touch "neuromodulation" attack via the classified cell tower electromagnetic weapon grid I first exposed three years ago. See my article, here:
So debate watchers, please stand by: Unless President Obama is again debilitated with an induced "brain fog" during Monday night's debate session, he just may be about to uncork an even bigger "October Surprise" than the one that may have been brewed up by his political and ideological enemies within.
FOR MORE OF VIC LIVINGSTON'S EXCLUSIVE REPORTING:
Thursday, October 4, 2012
The fatigued head-hanging. The constant eye-blinking, as if struggling to stay awake and alert. The absent stares. The scribbling on a notepad in an apparent desperate effort to fight off stupor. Disjointed verbal arguments. An inability to focus. A palpable passivity, malaise, seeming unwillingness -- or inability -- to aggressively engage.
A lack of will.
I have known -- I have experienced -- these symptoms for almost a decade. And while I cannot prove it, in my gut this veteran journalist believes that President Barack Obama's astoundingly weak debate performance on October 3 in Denver likely resulted from the behavior-altering electromagnetic spell of a cell tower radio frequency weapon system that elements of the U.S. military and intelligence apparatus have deployed to covertly attack, "entrain," subjugate and silently torture and impair supposed "dissidents," "undesirables" and "enemies of the state."
This is not the first time I've posited this theory. I wrote about the apparent electromagnetic "entrainment" of President Obama (and Vice President Biden) three years ago, when I first exposed the existence and heinous use of the "Multifunctional Radio Frequency Directed Energy Weapon" (RFDE) system, a publicly patented technology (U.S. Patent 7629918, held by Raytheon) deployed on cell towers everywhere across the United States. As I have reported, this network of "phased array" antennae installations is under the day-to-day operational command and control of Lockheed Martin, the world's largest defense contractor, under the direction of powerful and secretive U.S. government agencies and commands such as the U.S. Cyber Command, the Secret Service, the National Security Agency, and the Central Intelligence Agency.
U.S. SILENTLY TORTURES AMERICANS WITH CELL TOWER NEUROWEAPON
As noted in comments to my December 2011 expose, first published at http://NowPublic.com/scrivener, I remarked on President Obama's sudden profusion of facial moles; his weight loss, gaunt appearance, physical signs of premature aging such as rapidly graying hair, balding streaks on his scalp -- and, tellingly, I believe, a teleprompter that literally shattered in mid-air, leaving its stand upright, a phenomenon that was widely reported -- and mocked as an omen -- by right-wing media such as The Drudge Report.
|"Joe Biden Syndrome" -- forced sleep induced by psychopath|
war criminals among U.S.-contractor "security cult"?
(Photo courtesy ABC News)
I've also written about numerous cases of television news reporters, anchors and weathercasters who have been suddenly reduced to incomprehensible gibberish, blank stares and consciousness lapses while on the air. Google the name "Serene Branson" for one notorious and highly publicized example.
This technology is not fantasy. It is documented fact. It also is documented fact that government agencies and commands, ranging from the U.S. Secret Service to the U.S. Air Force Cyber Command, have developed electromagnetic radio frequency "directed energy" weapon systems, as cited in my reporting, summarized in my article "U.S. Silently Tortures Americans with Cell Tower Neuroweapon."
So if our nation's top elected leaders are under covert electromagnetic attack, as much forensic, empirical evidence seems to indicate, who are the perpetrators? While an internet search of the term "electromagnetic weapon" might lead a reader to believe that such attacks can be mounted by an individual equipped with a hand-held "ray gun" device, it's much more likely that the source is the nationwide electromagnetic weapon cell tower grid. This weapon system is mounted on proprietary cell towers as well as "co-located" installations shared by cellular telephone providers.
Multiple agencies, commands and corporations have a hand in the operation and control of this weapon system. It is not inconceivable that rogue elements could be making illicit use of the system to further a radical ideological or political agenda.
This reporter does know this: This cell tower weapon grid is being used to attack, impair, harm, subjugate, and, in effect, "slow-kill" untold thousands of extrajudicially "targeted" American citizens -- including this journalist, who has been under electromagnetic attack for at least eight years. It is hardly a stretch for me to believe that a weapon capable of covert behavior alteration might be deployed by geopolitical power-abusers to turn the President of the United States into their electromagnetically entrained puppet -- or to sabotage a president who likely has learned how this weapon system has been turned against American citizens, possibly including himself and members of his administration.
A final word: This journalist has sound reason to believe that both President Obama and Vice President Biden have been made aware of my reporting, and likely have initiated a comprehensive investigation into the past and present use and misuse of America's top secret electromagnetic weapon arsenal.
FOR MORE OF VETERAN JOURNALIST VIC LIVINGSTON'S EXCLUSIVE REPORTING:
http://VicLivingston.blogspot.com (article list in right-hand-column)
http://NowPublic.com/scrivener (click on "stories")